Novel methods for micro particles’ detection: From expectations to implementation

Alexander E. Berezin, Richard E Mokhnach


Microparticles (MPs) are considered important diagnostic biological markers in many diseases with promising predictive value. There are several methods that currently used for the detection of number and characterization of structure and features of MPs. Therefore, the MP detection methods have been remained pretty costly and time consuming. The review is depicted the perspectives to use coupling methods for MP measurement and structure assay. Indeed, there is large body evidence regarding that the combination of atomic force microscopy or coupling nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) with microbeads, plasmon resonance method and fluorescence quantum dots could exhibit much more accurate ability to detect both number and structure of MPs when compared with traditional flow cytometry and fluorescent microscopy. Whether several combined methods would be useful for advanced MP detection is not fully clear, while it is extremely promising.

Full Text:

Open Access Article


Akers JC, Gonda D, Kim R, Carter BS, Chen CC. Biogenesis of extracellular vesicles (EV): exosomes, microvesicles, retrovirus-like vesicles, and apoptotic bodies. J. Neurooncol. 2013; 113, 1–11.

Chironi GN, Boulanger CM, Simon A, Dignat-George F, Freyssinet JM, Tedgui A. Endothelial microparticles in diseases. Cell Tissue Res. 2009; 335, 143–151.

Melki I, Tessandier N, Zufferey A, Boilard E. Platelet microvesicles in health and disease. Platelets. 2017:1-8. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2016.1265924. [Epub ahead of print]

Berezin AE. Microparticles in Chronic Heart Failure. Advances in Clinical Chemistry / 1st Edition. Serial Editors: Gregory S. Makowski 2017; Vol. 79, 1-252 p.

Berezin A. Impaired Phenotype of Circulating Endothelial-Derived Microparticles: Novel Marker of Cardiovascular Risk. Journal of Cardiology and Therapy. 2015; 2 (2), 273-278

Berezin AE. Prognostication in different heart failure phenotypes: the role of circulating biomarkers. Journal of Circulating Biomarkers. 2016, 5:01 doi: 10.5772/62797.

Berezin AE. Biological markers of cardiovascular diseases. Part 4. Diagnostic and prognostic value of biological markers at risk stratification among patients with heart failure. LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH, Moskow, 2015. - 329 p.

Berezin AE, Kremzer AA, Martovitskaya YV, Samura TA, Berezina TA, Zulli A, et al. The utility of biomarker risk prediction score in patients with chronic heart failure. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8(10): 18255-64.

Jaiswal R, Johnson MS, Pokharel D, Krishnan SR, Bebawy M. Microparticles shed from multidrug resistant breast cancer cells provide a parallel survival pathway through immune evasion. BMC Cancer. 2017; 17(1): 104. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3102-2.

Dignat-George F, Boulanger CM. The many faces of endothelial microparticles. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011; 31, 27–33.

Berezin AE. Biomarkers for cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients. Heart. 2016;102:1939-1941

Forde CT, Karri SK, Young AM, Ogilvy CS. Predictive markers in traumatic brain injury: opportunities for a serum biosignature. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2014; 28, 8–15

Berezin AE, Kremzer AA, Berezina TA, Martovitskaya YuV. The pattern of circulating microparticles in patients with diabetes mellitus with asymptomatic atherosclerosis. Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine. 2016; 71 (1): 38-45.

Berezin AE. Impaired Immune Phenotype of Endothelial Cell-derived Micro Particles: The Missing Link between Diabetes-related States and Risk of Cardiovascular Complications? J Data Mining Genomics & Proteomics. 2016; 7 (2), 195-197

Berezin AE, Mokhnach RE. The promises, methodological discrepancies and pitfalls in measurement of cell-derived extracellular vesicles in diseases. J Biotechnol Biomater, 2016; 6 (2): 232-239 doi: 10.4172/2155-952X.1000232

Briens A, Gauberti M, Parcq J, Montaner J, Vivien D, Martinez de Lizarrondo S. Nano-zymography Using Laser-Scanning Confocal Microscopy Unmasks Proteolytic Activity of Cell-Derived Microparticles. Theranostics. 2016; 6(5): 610-26.

Witwer KW, Buzás EI, Bemis LT, Bora A, Lässer C, Lötvall J, et al. Standardization of sample collection, isolation and analysis methods in extracellular vesicle research. J Extracell Vesicles. 2013; 2.

van der Pol E, van Gemert MJ, Sturk A, Nieuwland R, van Leeuwen TG. Single vs. swarm detection of microparticles and exosomes by flow cytometry. J Thromb Haemost. 2012; 10(5):919-30.

Simonsen JB. A liposome-based size calibration method for measuring microvesicles by flow cytometry. J Thromb Haemost. 2016; 14(1): 186-90.

Ben-Dov IZ, Whalen VM, Goilav B, Max KE, Tuschl T. Cell and Microvesicle Urine microRNA Deep Sequencing Profiles from Healthy Individuals: Observations with Potential Impact on Biomarker Studies. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1): e0147249.

Nolan JP, Jones JC. Detection of platelet vesicles by flow cytometry. Platelets. 2017; 28(3):256-262.

Allison DP, Mortensen NP, Sullivan CJ, Doktycz MJ. Atomic force microscopy of biological samples. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2010;2:618–34.

Yuana Y, Oosterkamp TH, Bahatyrova S, Ashcroft B, Garcia Rodriguez P, Bertina RM, et al. Atomic force microscopy: a novel approach to the detection of nanosized blood microparticles. J Thromb Haemost. 2010; 8:315–23

van der Pol E, Hoekstra AG, Sturk A, Otto C, van Leeuwen TG, Nieuwland R. Optical and non-optical methods for detection and characterization of microparticles and exosomes.J Thromb Haemost. 2010; 8: 2596–607.

Hoo CM, Starostin N, West P, Mecartney ML. A comparison of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and synamic light scattering (DLS) methods to characterize nanoparticle size distributions. J Nanopart Res 2008; 10: 89-96

Vogel R, Wilmott G, Kozak DM, Roberts GS, Anderson W, Groenewegen L, Glossop B, Barnett A, Turner A, Trau M. Quantitative sizing of nano/microparticles with tunable elastomeric pore sensor. Anal Chem 2011; 83: 3499–506

Zhang H, Chon CH, Pan X, Li D. Methods for counting particles in microfluidic applications. Microfluid Nanofluid 2009; 7: 739–49.

Spill YG, Nilges M. SAS profile correlations reveal SAS hierarchical nature and information content. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5): e0177309.

Krumrey M, Gleber G, Scholze F, Wernecke J. Synchrotron radiation-based x-ray reflection and scattering techniques for dimensional nanometrology. Meas Sci Technol 2011; 22: 094032

Kosman J, Jatschka J, Csaki A, Fritzsche W, Juskowiak B, Stranik O. A New Strategy for Silver Deposition on Au Nanoparticles with the Use of Peroxidase-Mimicking DNAzyme Monitored via a Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Technique. Sensors (Basel). 2017; 17(4). doi: 10.3390/s17040849.

Antohe I, Spasic D, Delport F, Li J, Lammertyn J. Nanoscale patterning of gold-coated optical fibers for improved plasmonic sensing. Nanotechnology. 2017; 28(21): 215301.

Enjeti AK, Ariyarajah A, D'Crus A, Seldon M, Lincz LF. Correlative analysis of nanoparticle tracking, flow cytometric and functional measurements for circulating microvesicles in normal subjects. Thromb Res. 2016; 145:18-23.

Obeid S, Ceroi A, Mourey G, Saas P, Elie-Caille C, Boireau W. Development of a NanoBioAnalytical platform for "on-chip" qualification and quantification of platelet-derived microparticles. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017; 93: 250-259.

Wang J, Zhong Y, Ma X, Xiao X, Cheng C, Chen Y, et al. Analyses of Endothelial Cells and Endothelial Progenitor Cells Released Microvesicles by Using Microbead and Q-dot Based Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 24679. doi: 10.1038/srep24679.

Patil R, Ghosh K, Shetty S. A simple clot based assay for detection of procoagulant cell-derived microparticles. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 54(5): 799-803. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0508.

Xi Y, Pozzo LD. Electric field directed formation of aligned conjugated polymer fibers. Soft Matter. 2017. doi: 10.1039/c7sm00485k. [Epub ahead of print]

Chiu NF, Kuo CT, Lin TL, Chang CC, Chen CY. Ultra-high sensitivity of the non-immunological affinity of graphene oxide-peptide-based surface plasmon resonance biosensors to detect human chorionic gonadotropin. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017; 94:351-357.

Erdbrügger U, Lannigan J. Analytical challenges of extracellular vesicle detection: A comparison of different techniques. Cytometry A. 2016; 89(2): 123-34.

Kumar S, Milani G, Takatsuki H, Lana T, Persson M, Frasson C, et al. Sensing protein antigen and microvesicle analytes using high-capacity biopolymer nano-carriers. Analyst. 2016; 141(3):836-46.



  • There are currently no refbacks.